Subscribe
Search
ePaper
Newsletters
Subscribe
ePaper
Newsletters
Art market
Museums & heritage
Exhibitions
Books
Podcasts
Columns
Technology
Adventures with Van Gogh
Art market
Museums & heritage
Exhibitions
Books
Podcasts
Columns
Technology
Adventures with Van Gogh
Search
Law
news

Swiss ‘freeport king’s’ assets worth $500m unfrozen by Singapore court

Yves Bouvier denies Russian billionaire’s claim that he overcharged for $1bn-worth of art

Anny Shaw
25 August 2015
Share

Singapore’s court of appeal has unfrozen the assets of the Swiss businessman and “freeport king”, Yves Bouvier. The worldwide Mareva injunction, which had been imposed on Bouvier in March after civil proceedings that were started in a Singapore court, prevented him from disposing of any personal assets worth up to $500m.

The injunction came after a criminal complaint filed in Monaco in January by the family trusts controlled by Dmitry Rybolovlev, the Russian billionaire and owner of AS Monaco football club, who accused Bouvier of complicity in money laundering and fraud.

Rybolovlev claims Bouvier overcharged him by $1bn on the sale of 38 works of art between 2003 and 2014. Leonardo da Vinci’s Salvator Mundi, 1498-1506, and Modigliani’s Nu couché au coussin bleu, 1916, are thought to be among the works involved. Bouvier denies all charges.

Despite accepting that it “should not wade into the merits in a case such as this”, which is at an interlocutory stage, the Singapore court raised questions about Rybolovlev’s claims. The Rybolovlev family trusts “received what they bargained for and at the price they were willing to pay”, according to the judgment. However, the court also acknowledged there was a “good arguable case of dishonesty” on Bouvier’s part.

“On one view, there will be no fraud at all: Mr Bouvier can be seen as a wily businessman who employed a questionable (and perhaps barely legal), although ultimately profitable, approach to business. On another, Mr Bouvier can be seen as an errant agent who is liable to the respondents for fraudulent misrepresentation or breach of fiduciary duties,” the judgment said.

Tetiana Bersheda, the lawyer representing Rybolovlev and the Rybolovlev family trusts, says she notes the Singapore court’s decision, but adds that it is “only part of a much wider set of legal actions”, which were first triggered in Monaco. “The decision does not in any way prejudice the work of investigators and judges in the French and Monegasque jurisdictions.”

Law
Share
Subscribe to The Art Newspaper’s digital newsletter for your daily digest of essential news, views and analysis from the international art world delivered directly to your inbox.
Newsletter sign-up
Information
About
Contact
Cookie policy
Data protection
Privacy policy
Frequently Asked Questions
Subscription T&Cs
Terms and conditions
Advertise
Sister Papers
Sponsorship policy
Follow us
Facebook
Instagram
YouTube
LinkedIn
© The Art Newspaper