Subscribe
Search
ePaper
Newsletters
Subscribe
ePaper
Newsletters
Art market
Museums & heritage
Exhibitions
Books
Podcasts
Columns
Technology
Adventures with Van Gogh
Art market
Museums & heritage
Exhibitions
Books
Podcasts
Columns
Technology
Adventures with Van Gogh
Search
Art market
news

Convicted art fraudster Ezra Chowaiki subject of yet more legal drama

New racketeering suit against the disgraced New York art dealer, brought by a Spanish collector regarding paintings by Picasso and Léger, gets off to a mixed start

Riah Pryor
15 May 2020
Share
Former art dealer Ezra Chowaiki leaves Federal Court with his lawyer after his arraignment in 2018 © Matthew McDermott/Polaris

Former art dealer Ezra Chowaiki leaves Federal Court with his lawyer after his arraignment in 2018 © Matthew McDermott/Polaris

The legal dramas surrounding the former art dealer and convicted fraudster Ezra Chowaiki continued last month with a fresh New York suit concerning two paintings, Le Gueridon by Pablo Picasso and Composition avec Profil de Femme by Fernand Léger.

The complaint, brought by the Spanish collector Alejandro Domingo Malvar Egerique, accuses Chowaiki and David and Linda Benrimon of the New York based DBFA Gallery (with others, jointly referred to as the "Benrimon defendants"), of running various criminal enterprises. It argues the group violated the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act [RICO] and ultimately cost him possession of the two paintings.

The dispute joins a web of claims sparked by Chowaiki’s bankruptcy in late 2017 and criminal conviction in 2018 for wire fraud, conspiracy and transportation of stolen property. Having pled guilty to one count of wire fraud, he received an 18-month sentence and was ordered to return $16.6m alongside more than 20 paintings, including works by Picasso, Degas and Chagall.

According to this most recent lawsuit, the Picasso and Léger paintings were first bought by Egerique in Sotheby’s London in 2007 and were later sent to the Chowaiki’s gallery. After numerous requests for the works’s return, it is alleged that Chowaiki sold the Leger on, without sharing the money with Egerique and wrongfully gave the Picasso to the Benrimon defendants, as collateral for a loan.

At this stage of the complaint, New York District judge, Katherine Polk Failla, dismissed all claims made under RICO and numerous other claims against the Benrimon defendants. The claims against Chowaiki which survive to the next stage include common law fraud, conversion and replevin (a process geared towards recovering goods which were wrongfully taken). Conversion and replevin actions also survive against the Benrimon defendants, but they were awarded $20,000 for costs incurred defending a number of the dismissed allegations.

Parties will file their answers to the complaint this week. “My clients acted in good faith all along and they deserve this resounding victory,” says Luke Nikas, the lawyer representing the Benrimon defendants. Representatives from the other parties did not respond to requests for comment.

This is not the first civil lawsuit to pursue losses linked with Chowaiki's bankruptcy and connected to the criminal case. In late 2018 and early 2019, the Pennsylvania collector Rick Silver obtained orders from two federal courts recognising his ownership of Bouquet de giroflées, in which a group of London galleries (Alon Zakaim Fine Art Limited, Galerie B. Weil Limited, and Thomas Gibson Fine Art Limited) had purportedly bought shares, from Chowaiki, without Silver’s knowledge or consent.

Art marketLawFraudArt lawEzra Chowaiki
Share
Subscribe to The Art Newspaper’s digital newsletter for your daily digest of essential news, views and analysis from the international art world delivered directly to your inbox.
Newsletter sign-up
Information
About
Contact
Cookie policy
Data protection
Privacy policy
Frequently Asked Questions
Subscription T&Cs
Terms and conditions
Advertise
Sister Papers
Sponsorship policy
Follow us
Facebook
Instagram
YouTube
LinkedIn
© The Art Newspaper