Subscribe
Search
ePaper
Newsletters
Subscribe
ePaper
Newsletters
Art market
Museums & heritage
Exhibitions
Books
Podcasts
Columns
Technology
Adventures with Van Gogh
Art market
Museums & heritage
Exhibitions
Books
Podcasts
Columns
Technology
Adventures with Van Gogh
Search
Law
news

Convictions as German case against dealers in Russian avant-garde art comes to an end

Itzhak Zarug and his business partner Moez Ben Hazaz found guilty of fabricating provenance of three works

Gareth Harris
16 March 2018
Share
Itzhak Zarug courtesy of the Zarug Collection

Itzhak Zarug courtesy of the Zarug Collection

A court case in Germany centred on an alleged Russian avant-garde forgery ring has ended after German state prosecutors withdrew the central indictments against the alleged masterminds—the Israeli dealer Itzhak Zarug and his business partner Moez Ben Hazaz—early last month.

Zarug and Hazaz were arrested in June 2013, and accused by German authorities of selling forged works by artists such as Wassily Kandinsky and Alexej von Jawlensky through Zarug’s SMZ gallery in Wiesbaden, making more than £2m. More than 1,800 disputed works were seized and examined by ten international experts, according to a statement released by Zarug’s legal team.

Kasimir Malevich, Suprematism (1915-16) was seized by police Courtesy of the Zarug Collection

“It is very important to remember this trial set out to prove the collection was fake and that Zarug was the mastermind of a criminal gang. Both allegations collapsed,” says Zarug’s legal representative. Zarug says in a statement: “Issues of authenticity are rampant in the market for the Russian avant-garde, but it is no excuse for a witch-hunt.”

However, Zarug received a sentence of 32 months from Wiesbaden’s regional court for fabricating the provenance of three works purportedly by artists such as Rodchenko and Lissitzky. Zarug’s legal team says that the dealer will not serve time as he has already spent more than three years in detention; Hazaz, who could not be reached for comment, received a sentence of three years. The pair were also ordered to pay around €1m in damages.

According to The Guardian, 19 works were eventually included in the charge sheet but the court case collapsed after eight art historians called as expert witnesses withdrew their verdicts or were rejected by the defence. Patricia Railing, an expert on Malevich, gave evidence supporting Zarug, saying that four paintings by the aforementioned Russian artist were consistent with his use of geometry. Andrei Nakov, Railing’s ex-husband who compiled Malevich’s catalogue raisonné, also testified as a witness.

Law
Share
Subscribe to The Art Newspaper’s digital newsletter for your daily digest of essential news, views and analysis from the international art world delivered directly to your inbox.
Newsletter sign-up
Information
About
Contact
Cookie policy
Data protection
Privacy policy
Frequently Asked Questions
Subscription T&Cs
Terms and conditions
Advertise
Sister Papers
Sponsorship policy
Follow us
Facebook
Instagram
YouTube
LinkedIn
© The Art Newspaper