Subscribe
Search
ePaper
Newsletters
Subscribe
ePaper
Newsletters
Art market
Museums & heritage
Exhibitions
Books
Podcasts
Columns
Technology
Adventures with Van Gogh
Art market
Museums & heritage
Exhibitions
Books
Podcasts
Columns
Technology
Adventures with Van Gogh
Search
Art
news

Judgment against Max Ernst expert Werner Spies overturned in appeal

French court has reversed a decision fining the scholar for authenticating a fake work of art produced by Wolfgang Beltracchi

Alexis Fournol
9 December 2015
Share

In a decision that should bring some relief to art experts, the German art historian and the former director of the Centre Pompidou, Werner Spies, no longer has to pay a fee for mistakenly authenticating a painting as a genuine work by Max Ernst. On 3 December, the Versailles Court of Appeal overturned a 2013 ruling against Spies that ordered him to reimburse the collector Louis Reijtenbagh for a work that turned out to be a fake produced by the forger Wolfgang Beltracchi.

The court said “the author of a catalogue raisonné who expresses an opinion outside of a determined transaction cannot be charged with a responsibility equivalent to that of an expert consulted in the context of a sale”. It also said that it “cannot be required of the author of a catalogue raisonné to subject each work in a catalogue published under his responsibility to the execution of a scientific expert assessment, which requires the removal of fragments of the work and represents a significant cost”.

Spies authenticated the work, Tremblement de terre (Earthquake), in a letter dated 2002 and planned to include it in his Max Ernst catalogue raisonné. The painting then appeared in an exhibition of the artist’s work at the 2004 edition of the Biennale des Antiquaires in Paris.

In 2009, the painting was sold at Sotheby’s in New York for $1.1m. It had been consigned by Reijtenbagh’s company Monte Carlo Art, who sued Spies and the previous owner, the dealer Jacques de la Béraudière, after the forgery was detected. In 2013, the Versailles district court ordered them to repay the full purchase price of  €652,883.

ArtNewsLawFakes & copies
Share
Subscribe to The Art Newspaper’s digital newsletter for your daily digest of essential news, views and analysis from the international art world delivered directly to your inbox.
Newsletter sign-up
Information
About
Contact
Cookie policy
Data protection
Privacy policy
Frequently Asked Questions
Subscription T&Cs
Terms and conditions
Advertise
Sister Papers
Sponsorship policy
Follow us
Facebook
Instagram
YouTube
LinkedIn
© The Art Newspaper