Subscribe
Search
ePaper
Newsletters
Subscribe
ePaper
Newsletters
Art market
Museums & heritage
Exhibitions
Books
Podcasts
Columns
Art of Luxury
Adventures with Van Gogh
Art market
Museums & heritage
Exhibitions
Books
Podcasts
Columns
Art of Luxury
Adventures with Van Gogh
Search
Tate
archive

National Portrait Gallery: more transparent than Tate

Commission sum disclosed for Tom Phillips, unlike the purchase of "The Upper Room"

Martin Bailey
1 January 2006
Share

When National Portrait Gallery (NPG) director Dr Charles Saumarez Smith left his post to move to the National Gallery in 2002, another trustee, Tom Phillips, was paid to paint his portrait for the collection. The NPG was completely open about the commission, allowing a television film to be made about the process. The sum paid, £11,000, a discount on Phillips’ commercial rate, has also been disclosed. In the NPG’s trustee minutes of 10 July 2003, which are publicly available, the price is stated. In the NPG’s 2002-3 annual report and accounts, laid before Parliament, it is also recorded under Related Party Transactions: “The trustee Mr Tom Phillips was commissioned to create a portrait of the outgoing director for a fee of £11,000”. With The upper room, although the purchase is noted in the Tate’s 2004-5 accounts, no sum is given.

TateCommissionsAcquisitionsNational Portrait GalleryChris OfiliMuseums & HeritageMuseum trustees
Share
Subscribe to The Art Newspaper’s digital newsletter for your daily digest of essential news, views and analysis from the international art world delivered directly to your inbox.
Newsletter sign-up
Information
About
Contact
Cookie policy
Data protection
Privacy policy
Frequently Asked Questions
Subscription T&Cs
Terms and conditions
Advertise
Sister Papers
Sponsorship policy
Follow us
Facebook
Instagram
YouTube
LinkedIn
© The Art Newspaper